Garuda - Garba Rujukan Digital

Article Per Year (5 Year)

All

Forum Arkeologi

fa
Website

Published by Balai Arkeologi Bali

ISSN : 08543232 EISSN : 25276832 DOI : -

Core Subject : Humanities, Art,

Arts Humanities

Forum Arkeologi Journal as a media for disseminating various information related to culture in the past, based on the results of archaeological research and cultural scientific studies. Forum Arkeologi Journal is a scientific journal published by Balai Arkeologi Bali since 1988. Forum Arkeologi Journal published twice a year. Each article published in Forum Arkeologi reviewed by at least two peer-reviewers who have the competence and appropriate field of expertise. Editorial received writings of archaeological research, history, ethnography, anthropology, and other supporting science related to human and culture. Forum Arkeologi is accredited as national scientific journal number 772 / AU1 / P2MI-LIPI / 08 / 2017. Starting at the end of 2016, Forum Arkeologi begins to use electronic journal systems following technological and information developments and facilitate reader access.

Arjuna Subject : -

Articles 10 Documents

Search results for , issue "VOLUME 28, NOMOR 1, APRIL 2015" : 10 Documents clear

PROSES PEMBENTUKAN BUDAYA TINGGALAN ARKEOLOGI DI KABUPATEN BADUNG Putu Eka Juliawati
Forum Arkeologi VOLUME 28, NOMOR 1, APRIL 2015
Publisher : Balai Arkeologi Bali

Archaeological remains in Bali commonly are still being used by society until now. Those remains experienced cultural processes before entering current systemic context. The aim of this research is to understand cultural formation process of archaeological remains, including its means and functions. The data were collected through observation, interview, and literature study. Analysis was done through classification of field data, and then presented in descriptive-qualitative method. Archaeological remains, which are discussed here, are personification statue, Ganesa statue, lingga, and stambha. Those artefacts have functions in social system of society, both in the past and present, although some of the artefacts had experienced disposal or abandonment process.Tinggalan arkeologi di Bali kebanyakan masih difungsikan sampai saat ini. Tinggalan tersebut mengalami proses budaya yang panjang hingga masuk ke dalam konteks sistem sekarang. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui proses pembentukan budaya tinggalan arkeologi tersebut, termasuk dinamika fungsi dan maknanya. Data dikumpulkan melalui observasi, wawancara, dan studi pustaka. Analisis dilakukan melalui pengklasifikasian data lapangan, kemudian disajikan secara deskriptif-kualitatif. Tinggalan arkeologi yang dibahas adalah arca perwujudan, Arca Ganesa, lingga, dan stambha. Benda tersebut berfungsi dalam sistem sosial masyarakat masa lalu dan masa kini, meskipun sebagian pernah mengalami proses buang atau ditinggalkan.

KUBUR TEMPAYAN DI SIULAK TENANG, DATARAN TINGGI JAMBI DALAM PERSPEKTIF EKONOMI, SOSIAL, DAN KEPERCAYAAN Tri Marhaeni S. Budisantosa
Forum Arkeologi VOLUME 28, NOMOR 1, APRIL 2015
Publisher : Balai Arkeologi Bali

Siulak Tenang is a jar burial site amongst the other similar sites located on the highland of Jambi. Researches for burial jar have been done, both in Indonesia and other regions such as Malaysia, Brunei, and Philliphine, so that the result of this research can add new data about jar burial. This writing discusses the data obtained from the excavation in Siulak Tenang in 2014. The artefactual analysis applied methods of specific analysis, quantitative analysis, contextual analysis, and comparative analysis.The discussion reveals that most of the jar burials are single burials except the one covered with a pot. Few burial gift were also found in the forms of pottery vessel and bronze things. It shows that the past Siulak Tenang had involved in maritime trade or exchange network, recocgnized the difference of social status, and believed in life after death.Siulak Tenang merupakan salah satu situs kubur tempayan di dataran tinggi Jambi. Penelitian kubur tempayan telah lama dilakukan, baik di Indonesia maupun wilayah lain, seperti Malaysia, Brunei, dan Filipina, sehingga hasil penelitian ini dapat menambah data baru tentang kubur tempayan. Penelitian ini membahas hasil ekskavasi Situs Siulak Tenang tahun 2014. Analisis artefak menerapkan metode analisis spesifik, analisis kuantitatif, analisis kontekstual, dan analisis komparatif. Hasil penelitian di Situs Siulak Tenang sebagian besar merupakan kubur tempayan tunggal, kecuali satu tempayan yang ditutup dengan periuk, sebagian kecil terdapat benda bekal kubur berupa wadah gerabah dan benda perunggu. Hal tersebut menunjukkan adanya aktivitas perdagangan atau pertukaran, dikenalnya stratifikasi sosial dan kepercayaan akan kehidupan di dunia arwah.

SUMBER DAYA ARKEOLOGI KAWASAN KINTAMANI SEBAGAI MODAL PEMBANGUNAN PARIWISATA DAN KOTA PUSAKA DI KABUPATEN BANGLI Ni Komang Ayu Astiti
Forum Arkeologi VOLUME 28, NOMOR 1, APRIL 2015
Publisher : Balai Arkeologi Bali

Archaeological resources found scattered in the area of Kintamani are tangible cultural heritage which was passed down from generation to generation. These resources are largely derived from prehistoric time especially megalithic tradition and associated with respect to the ancestors. These resources can be a regional asset that can be managed effectively as the capital of tourism development and heritage city. It aims to bring their present value but still pay attention to preservation aspects. The data were collected through observation, completed with interview and literature study. Then, it was analysed descriptive-qualitatively. Kintamani has large potential of archaeological resources which most of them are stored in temples. Management strategies that can be applied namely empowering local communities by involving them directly as the subject of planning, involving various stakeholders, and support from the legal source. The management system must be sustainable in both socio-cultural and economic.Sumber daya arkeologi yang ditemukan tersebar di kawasan Kintamani merupakan warisan budaya tangible yang diwariskan secara turun temurun. Sumber daya ini sebagian besar berasal dari masa prasejarah khususnya megalitik yang berkaitan dengan penghormatan kepada leluhur. Tinggalan budaya ini merupakan aset daerah yang dapat dikelola secara efektif sebagai modal pembangunan pariwisata dan kota pusaka yang bertujuan untuk memunculkan nilai kekiniannya dengan tetap memperhatikan aspek-aspek pelestarian. Aset tersebut digali dengan observasi langsung yang dilengkapi dengan wawancara, serta ditunjang dengan studi pustaka, kemudian dianalisis secara deskriptif-kualitatif. Kawasan Kintamani mempunyai potensi sumber daya arkeologi yang cukup banyak dan sebagian besar disimpan di lingkungan pura. Strategi pengelolaan yang dapat diterapkan yaitu harus memberdayakan potensi masyarakat lokal, dengan melibatkannya secara langsung sebagai subyek dari perencanaan, pemangku kepentingan, dan dukungan sumber hukum. Sistem pengelolaan tersebut harus berkesinambungan, baik secara sosial budaya maupun ekonomi.

APLIKASI AJARAN IWA SIDDHANTA DI SITUS WASAN Nyoman Rema
Forum Arkeologi VOLUME 28, NOMOR 1, APRIL 2015
Publisher : Balai Arkeologi Bali

Siwa Siddhanta is the largest teaching and sect in the philosophy of Shiva. This teaching in Indonesia is a conglomeration of various schools of thought that once flourished in this country, especially in Bali which had grown after the 9th century AD. This study aims to determine the development of Siwa sect in Bali and the application of the iwa Siddhanta on archaeological remains in the Site Wasan. Data collection begins with a literature study, followed by observation. Once the data is collected, analyzed, and presented in a descriptive-qualitative method. The results of this study are cultural remains in the form of temple, pond, lingga, a statue of Ganesha, Nandi, goat statue, Catur Mukha, and arca perwujudan. After studying, it appears that the teaching of Siwa Siddhanta application in this site is in the form of worshipping media.Siwa Siddhanta adalah ajaran dan mazhab terbesar dalam filsafat Siwa. Ajaran ini di Indonesia merupakan konglomerasi dari berbagai mazhab yang pernah berkembang di negara ini, khususnya di Bali telah berkembang setelah abad ke-9 Masehi. Tujuannya adalah untuk mengetahui perkembangan mazhab Siwa di Bali dan aplikasi ajaran Siwa Siddhanta terhadap tinggalan arkeologi di Situs Wasan. Pengumpulan data dilakukan dengan studi pustaka, dilanjutkan dengan observasi langsung di lapangan. Setelah data terkumpul, dianalisis, dan disajikan secara deskrptif-kualitatif. Beberapa tinggalan budaya yang ditemukan berupa candi, lingga, arca Ganesa, Nandi, kambing, Catur Mukha, kolam dan arca perwujudan. Berdasarkan analisis tampak adanya aplikasi ajaran Siwa Siddhanta dalam wujud media pemujaan.

ARCA GANESA BERTANGAN DELAPAN BELAS DI PURA PINGIT MELAMBA BUNUTIN, KINTAMANI, BANGLI A.A. Gde Bagus
Forum Arkeologi VOLUME 28, NOMOR 1, APRIL 2015
Publisher : Balai Arkeologi Bali

Eighteen-handed Ganesa statue at Pura Pingit Melamba Kintamani Bangli is an interesting find because of its eighteen hands and various attributes. The statue is the only one found in Bali, even in Indonesia. This research aims to know the form and function of the Ganesa for Kintamani people. This research uses literature study, observation and interview method to collect data. The data was analyzed qualitatively. The result of this researh is the Ganesa statue. It is described standing on padmaganda with eighteen hands holding some attributes. It wears jatamakuta crown with candrakapala ornament. There is sculpture of two lotus plants which grow up from their root on the right and left side of the Ganesa. That sculpture style indicates the influence from Singhasari Kingdom. The eighteen-handed Ganesa functions as Wighneswara and Winayaka.Arca Ganesa di Pura Pingit Melamba Kintamani Bangli merupakan temuan yang menarik, karena bertangan delapan belas dan atribut yang beragam. Temuan ini merupakan satu-satunya di Bali, bahkan di Indonesia. Penelitian ini dilakukan untuk mengetahui bentuk dan fungsi arca tersebut bagi masyarakat pendukungnya. Pengumpulan data dilakukan dengan studi pustaka, observasi, dan wawancara, dianalisis secara kualitatif. Temuan penelitian ini berupa Arca Ganesa. Arca tersebut diwujudkan dalam sikap berdiri di atas padmaganda, bertangan delapan belas dengan berbagai atribut, memakai mahkota jatamakuta dengan hiasan Candrakapala. Di sebelah kanankiri arca dipahatkan hiasan bunga padma yang tumbuh langsung dari umbinya, diduga dari masa Singhasari. Ganesa tersebut berfungsi sebagai Wighneswara dan Winayaka.

ARCA PEREMPUAN DAN ARCA LAKI-LAKI PADA KELOMPOK ARCA MEGALITIK PASEMAH, SUMATERA SELATAN: PERPESPEKTIF GENDER Rr. Triwurjani
Forum Arkeologi VOLUME 28, NOMOR 1, APRIL 2015
Publisher : Balai Arkeologi Bali

Pasemah plateau in South Sumatra has a distribution of megalithic statues of various shapes. These statues depict an activity between people in a social group. Human statues differentiated by gender and age, the statues of female and male, along with the children. The difference of depictions of female and male statues are discussed from the perspective of gender. This study aims to identify and understand gender relations between female and male in Pasemah megalithic culture. Results of the research is a description of the role in social life of female and male depictions in the form of megalithic statues. This study shows the tendency of gender inequality in females role.Dataran tinggi Pasemah di Sumatra Selatan memiliki sebaran arca megalitik dengan berbagai bentuk. Arca-arca ini menggambarkan suatu aktivitas antar manusia dalam suatu kelompok sosial. Arca manusia dibedakan berdasarkan jenis kelamin dan usianya, yaitu arca perempuan dan laki-laki, bersama dengan anak-anak. Perbedaan penggambaran arca perempuan dan lakilaki tersebut dibahas dari sudut pandang gender dalam penelitian ini. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui dan memahami relasi gender antara perempuan dan laki-laki dalam budaya megalitik Pasemah. Hasil penelitian berupa deskripsi peran dari penggambaran arca perempuan dan laki-laki di dalam kehidupan sosialnya. Penelitian ini menunjukkan adanya kecenderungan ketidaksetaraan gender dalam representasi penggambaran peran dari arca perempuan.

COVER FORUM ARKEOLOGI VOL. 28 NO. 1 APRIL 2015 Forum Arkeologi
Forum Arkeologi VOLUME 28, NOMOR 1, APRIL 2015
Publisher : Balai Arkeologi Bali

PREFACE FORUM ARKEOLOGI VOL. 28 NO. 1 APRIL 2015 Forum Arkeologi
Forum Arkeologi VOLUME 28, NOMOR 1, APRIL 2015
Publisher : Balai Arkeologi Bali

APPENDIX FORUM ARKEOLOGI VOL. 28 NO. 1 APRIL 2015 Forum Arkeologi
Forum Arkeologi VOLUME 28, NOMOR 1, APRIL 2015
Publisher : Balai Arkeologi Bali

BACK COVER FORUM ARKEOLOGI VOL. 28 NO. 1 APRIL 2015 Forum Arkeologi
Forum Arkeologi VOLUME 28, NOMOR 1, APRIL 2015
Publisher : Balai Arkeologi Bali

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 10

Filter by Year

2015 2015

Filter By Issues

All Issue VOLUME 34, NOMOR 2, OKTOBER 2021 VOLUME 34, NOMOR 1, APRIL 2021 VOLUME 33, NOMOR 2, OKTOBER 2020 VOLUME 33, NOMOR 1, April, 2020 VOLUME 32, NOMOR 2, OKTOBER, 2019 VOLUME 32, NOMOR 1, APRIL, 2019 VOLUME 31, NOMOR 2, OKTOBER, 2018 VOLUME 31, NOMOR 1, APRIL 2018 VOLUME 30, NOMOR 2, OKTOBER 2017 VOLUME 30, NOMOR 1, APRIL 2017 VOLUME 29, NOMOR 3, NOVEMBER 2016 VOLUME 29, NOMOR 2, AGUSTUS 2016 VOLUME 29, NOMOR 1, APRIL 2016 VOLUME 28, NOMOR 3, NOVEMBER 2015 VOLUME 28, NO 3, NOVEMBER 2015 VOLUME 28, NOMOR 2, AGUSTUS 2015 VOLUME 28, NOMOR 1, APRIL 2015 VOLUME 27, NOMOR 3, NOVEMBER 2014 VOLUME 27, NOMOR 2, AGUSTUS 2014 VOLUME 27, NOMOR 1, APRIL 2014 VOLUME 26, NOMOR 3, NOVEMBER 2013 VOLUME 26, NOMOR 2, AGUSTUS 2013 VOLUME 26, NOMOR 1, APRIL 2013 VOLUME 25, NOMOR 3, NOVEMBER 2012 VOLUME 25, NOMOR 2, AGUSTUS 2012 VOLUME 25, NO 1, APRIL 2012 VOLUME 25, NOMOR 1, APRIL 2012 VOLUME 24, NOMOR 3, NOVEMBER 2011 VOLUME 24, NOMOR 2, AGUSTUS 2011 VOLUME 24, NOMOR 1, APRIL 2011 VOLUME 23, NOMOR 3, NOVEMBER 2010 VOLUME 23, NOMOR 2, AGUSTUS 2010 VOLUME 23, NOMOR 1, APRIL 2010 VOLUME 22, NOMOR 1, MEI 2009 VOLUME 21, NOMOR 3, OKTOBER 2008 VOLUME 21, NOMOR 2, JULI 2008 VOLUME 21, NOMOR 1, MEI 2008 VOLUME 20, NOMOR 1, MEI 2007 VOLUME 19, NOMOR 2, OKTOBER 2006 VOLUME 19, NOMOR 1, MEI 2006 VOLUME 17, NOMOR 1, JUNI 2004 VOLUME 16, NOMOR 3, SEPTEMBER 2003 VOLUME 16, NOMOR 2, JUNI 2003 VOLUME 15, NOMOR 2, SEPTEMBER 2002 VOLUME 15, NOMOR 1, JUNI 2002 VOLUME 14, NOMOR 1, JULI 2001 VOLUME 13, NOMOR 2, NOVEMBER 2000 VOLUME 13, NOMOR 1, JUNI 2000 VOLUME 11, NOMOR 2, DESEMBER 1999 VOLUME 11, NOMOR 2, DESEMBER 1998 VOLUME 11, NOMOR 1, JANUARI 1998 VOLUME 10, NOMOR 2, NOVEMBER 1997 VOLUME 10, NOMOR 1, JUNI 1997 VOLUME 9, NOMOR 1, JANUARI 1996 VOLUME 8, NOMOR 2, MARET 1995 VOLUME 6, NOMOR 2, SEPTEMBER 1993 VOLUME 6, NOMOR 1, MARET 1993 VOLUME 2, NOMOR 2, FEBRUARI 1990 VOLUME 2, NOMOR 1, FEBRUARI 1989 More Issue

Home Page

OAI Link

Editorial Team

Contact

Reviewer

Google Scholar

Contact Name
-

Contact Email
-

Phone
-

Journal Mail Official
-

Editorial Address
-

Location
Kota denpasar,

Bali

INDONESIA

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Home Page

OAI Link

Editorial Team

Contact

Reviewer

Google Scholar

Contact Name -

Contact Email -

Phone -

Journal Mail Official -

Editorial Address -

Location Kota denpasar, Bali INDONESIA

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Contact Name
-

Contact Email
-

Phone
-

Journal Mail Official
-

Editorial Address
-

Location
Kota denpasar,

Bali

INDONESIA